After the execution of a senior Jamaat-e-Islami leader, the religious party faces an uncertain future.
SALEEM
SAMAD
Hours after Bangladesh executed Abdul Quader Molla, a top opposition leader,
for his role in the 1971 civil war that culminated into Bangladesh 's
independence from Pakistan activists from his party, the
Jamaat-e-Islami (JeI), staged riots. Violence has continued in the country
following the December 12 hanging, leading to dozens of deaths.
More than 100 JeI activists have been detained in a nation-wide
crackdown.
Molla's execution has lead to heated debates about the role of political
Islam in the country and the future for religious opposition parties.
"Bangladesh will be the first country to bury
'political Islam' which wrecked the traditional secular fabric of the society
since independence in 1971," explains professor Nazmul Ahsan Kalimullah,
who teaches Public Affairs in the Dhaka University .
'Surge and Decline'
JeI had opposed the break-up of Pakistan and
fought alongside Pakistan 's
military against pro-Independence forces. It was banned from politics upon the
formation of Bangladesh .
But a military coup in 1975 lifted the ban on JeI. During the 1980s, the
religious party joined a multi-party coalition and later supported the
Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP). In October 2001, it emerged as the
country's third largest party, securing 17 seats in the 300-member parliament.
Both the JeI and BNP led by Begum Khaleda Zia replaced the Awami League (AL),
which had been in power since 1996.
In 2008, AL led
by Sheikh Hasina came back to power even as JeI's popularity waned when it won
a mere 5 seats in national elections. And in 2010 AL began war crimes trials for events
surrounding the independence struggle under Bangladesh 's
International Crimes Tribunal (ICT).
Molla became the first person convicted by the tribunal. He was
initially sentenced to life in prison in February. Calling a life sentence as
too lenient, thousands across Bangladeshdemanded
he be hanged. And in September, the Supreme Court overturned life in prison and
replaced it with a death sentence.
With his hanging, some observers believe JeI's power also has been
executed.
While war veterans from 1971 and thousands of pro-independence youths
rejoiced after the hanging, the JeI's acting head Moqbul Ahmed warned
"people would [want] revenge" on the party's website, which triggered
a massive crackdown against JeI activists.
Ahmed has called on the international community to raise its voice
against the "repression on the opposition".
"Since coming to power the government (of Awami League) has
practiced unbridled corruption, nepotism and even torture upon members of the
opposition. They are now making a last-ditch attempt to stay in power
indefinitely by amending the constitution and destroying the state apparatus.
They have abolished the caretaker system of government and have enacted a new
system to hold elections under their own party government," the Jamaat
chief said, something which its political partner BNP also backs.
Both the parties have in recent months launched blockades; often
resulting in violence and killings, to press for their demands but the ruling AL so far seems unwilling to budge.
JeI says crackdown on its members and the hanging of its leader was
"politically motivated".
But others feel the executions were fair, as Jamaat's
paramilitary Al Badr had committed "heinous war abuses" for which
they need to be punished.
According to M A Hasan, of the War Crimes Fact Finding Committee, an
independent body investigating the 1971 massacres: "Al Badr had been
engaged in forced abduction and execution of Bangla-speaking pro-independence
nationalists and secularists to brutally muzzle the voices for freedom."
The war historian's documents claim that "local henchmen"
allied with Pakistani soldiers were involved in "killing at least 3
million and sexual abusing 400,000 women during the nine months civil war."
Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch and UN rights experts have
continued their criticism of the war crimes tribunals and the laws under which
they operate.
However, Bangladeshi authorities have always argued that they met
national standards and that justice is needed for war crimes committed during
the bloody war of independence from Pakistan .
'Partner's silence'
The BNP, Jel's erstwhile political ally, has been conspicuously silent
since Molla's execution.
It is currently pre-occupied in talks with the ruling AL over how to break the political deadlock.
"It seems BNP is more desperate for a political solution than
stalemate and may have deliberately overlooked JeI's concerns," Ahmed
explains.
The BNP has been holding series of blockades of the country's transport
system since December in protest of holding what it says is
"farcical" election in January.
A court has already declared the registration of the JeI as
"illegal" to contest national polls.
" [The] BNP's strategic election partner has become a dead horse
and a political burden for the opposition," says Nzmul Ahsan Kalimullah, a
professor of public administration at theUniversity of Dhaka . "It is time for BNP to shred JeI,
which will bring an end to political Islam which has haunted the nation
apparently for 30 years."
'Uncertain future'
JeI may not be a dead horse but even some party insiders believe it is
facing a worst crisis in its 40-year-long political history in Bangladesh .
"It would be a Herculean task to survive against the ruling party
which has an overwhelming majority in the government," says explains
Salauddin Babar, executive editor of the pro-JeI newspaper, Dainik Naya
Diganta, and a senior JeI member. "It will be an uphill battle to survive
the current political crisis JeI faces."
Babar believes that the crackdown weakend the party's chain of command
and Jel could crack under the pressure.
"The political future of the party has been challenged after a
sustained crackdown on the leadership. Jamaat's future is uncertain," he
says.
First
published in Al Jazeera news
portal, December 21, 2013
Saleem Samad is an award winning Bangladesh based
investigative journalist and an Ashoka Fellow. He is recipient of Hellman-Hammett
Grants award by New
York based Human Rights Watch (HRW) in 2005.